<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BUSHZOMBIE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bushzombie.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bushzombie.com</link>
	<description>So I Don't Have to Keep Repeating Myself</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 23:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Take the country back?</title>
		<link>http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=86</link>
		<comments>http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=86#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 23:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Bushzombie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The joke of the right is this notion that conservative wish to &#8220;Not have Obama make up their minds for them.&#8221; Yet this is exactly what conservatives perpetually embrace. 
Whether it is forcing a woman to give birth to a brainless child (no, not a tea-bagger, but a real brainless child), ensuring that energy will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The joke of the right is this notion that conservative wish to &#8220;Not have Obama make up their minds for them.&#8221; Yet this is exactly what conservatives perpetually embrace. </p>
<p>Whether it is forcing a woman to give birth to a brainless child (no, not a tea-bagger, but a real brainless child), ensuring that energy will always come from a centralized service or that consumers don&#8217;t have choice because they are at the mercy of monopolies, one thing is certain: Right-wingnut-conservatives love being told what to do. They love their talking points, loving lies like the flat-earthers they are. </p>
<p>- Iraq had WMDs (Tea-baggers will still argue this is true)<br />
- Wealth will trickle down if we give tax cuts to the rich (Tea-baggers will still argue this is true)<br />
- Exporting jobs will create cheaper goods and in turn a prosperous economy (Tea-baggers will still argue this is true)<br />
- Companies should self regulate and not be regulated by government (Tea-baggers will still argue this is true – no matter how much oil is in the ocean)<br />
- Schools should be run by the private sector (Tea-baggers will still argue this is true)<br />
- Insurance companies will deliver healthcare (Tea-baggers will still argue this is true)<br />
- The invisible hand will deliver a fair economic opportunity (Tea-baggers will still argue this is true)</p>
<p>In spite of the facts, like the fact these points have been played out and have been established as blatantly idiotic, Tea-baggers will still argue these and other brainless points are true.</p>
<p>Just let the &#8220;Free Market&#8221; (as if there was such a thing), run wild and let the brain dead make up their our minds. Vote with your dollars, the free marketers will tell you. Forget the crashed economy. It didn’t really happen. So what – big deal, who cares if CEOs make 35000 times what the workers make? It takes 35000 people to stand up to a single CEO; so what?  Isn’t that freedom? Freedom to give up your freedom, that’s what that is. </p>
<p>After 8 years of a myopic, narrow minded, greedy, free for all where the entire market crashed into the ground, it is suddenly because the &#8220;Government is making up our minds for us?&#8221; that the entire world economy is wrecked. No, it didn’t have anything to do with greedy corporations lying to clients and consumers. No, greedy banks didn’t get rich by robbing the entire wealth of the nation, then paying ½ the tax rate of the middle class that let them take it. Nah, no way, it was just an illusion. NOT!!!!!!!</p>
<p>The conservatives seem only to be in favor of not being too tough on the people who ripped them off. How brainwashed can conservobots be? They are helping the bank robbers load the loot into the get away car and then crying when their own 401K’s are MIA. My GAWD how idiotic can people be? It’s astonishing, absolutely whacked. </p>
<p>I no longer consider &#8220;right wingers&#8221; to be conservative, nor do I consider them to be &#8220;Right or Left&#8221;. They are not on a left/right axis. They are on the Z axis. It is impossible for a group to be so clueless and still have a mind that can make a rational decision. </p>
<p>Now that the government has been gutted of anyone who has 2 brain cells, the moronic right comes in and says, &#8220;See how crappy government is?&#8221; The ethically challenged right winger zealots must go first. How can you find who they are? Easy. It&#8217;s the boneheads saying they want to &#8220;Take the country back.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bushzombie.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=86</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting Real About Healthcare – What Liberals Must Consider in this Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=84</link>
		<comments>http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=84#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 21:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Bushzombie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am disappointedly enthusiastic about the healthcare bill. While this statement may seem like a contradiction, it’s not. Sure, like everyone else I have heard negatives about the bill. I heard something about it not having a public option. Insurance companies are going to get richer. Old people might pay as much as 3 times [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">I am disappointedly enthusiastic about the healthcare bill. While this statement may seem like a contradiction, it’s not. Sure, like everyone else I have heard negatives about the bill. I heard something about it not having a public option. Insurance companies are going to get richer. Old people might pay as much as 3 times more for insurance. But this is not my disappointment. I really wanted to see HB676 enacted. This made the most sense. But alas, it didn’t happen either. This was not my disappointment. The Republicans are ranting minute by minute about what a terrible bill this is, but I’m not listening to what they have to say. I am not disappointed in them either.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal">My disappointment is about what poor winners the liberals are. I’m a liberal, and I would love to complain about the bill. But I can’t. Every liberal I know is doing my complaining for me. I suppose the reason I’m a liberal is because I’m rather idealistic. I think crazy thoughts. For example, I don’t think that poor people should forgo cancer treatment because they cannot afford it. I actually think insurance companies should be responsible for treating people when they agreed to do so. But even though I am idealistic with silly thoughts, occasionally, as a liberal, I would like to think I can see a bigger picture. That brings me to my point.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal">This entire healthcare debate is a high stakes life and death game that will change the future of America. It doesn’t matter if you like this point or not. It’s the truth.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal">Liberals should embrace ideas for improvement, but lose the negativity. Whimpering about the senate healthcare legislation will result in a losing end game. Sorry, there is no tomorrow. This happens now or it doesn’t happen. With assured losses in the house and senate in 2010, the Calvary will not be here before the massacre is complete.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal">A failed bill equals no reform for decades. Furthermore, it means devastating losses in the midterms. Why do you think the Republicans hate this legislation so much? You didn’t actually think they cared about a bad bill did you?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal">If the bill would have passed on the senate with 65 or 70 votes, then I would feel differently. Then I would say there was room for improvement. It didn’t pass with 65 or 70 votes. It passed with 60 votes. Without procedural tricks, this bill would have failed had it been all that liberals wanted.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal">So let’s put a positive spin on this. There is more than one way to win a baseball game: with many singles or a few home runs. The bill provides more coverage to those who would never have it. It will reduce bankruptcies. It places restrictions on insurance firms. It’s not perfect and not the final game for healthcare reform. But it will only be an assured loss if forfeited.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal">Chanting “Kill the Bill” is not just detrimental to healthcare reform. This is a recipe for political destruction. This is the best way to ensure that Democrats enjoy another Jimmy Carter style loss in 2012 and a 1994 style loss in congress. I am sitting here right now listening to Newt Gingrich spew his rhetorical nonsense. The conservatives smell blood in the water and why wouldn’t they? The liberals are slashing their own wrists.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal">Attention liberals – listen up.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal">Assuming the House of Representatives can ignore the screams trying to scuttle the legislation, the healthcare bill will pass. And when it does, it will be a huge win for Democrats. Most importantly, this is the pendulum stopping and beginning to swing back the other direction.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal">I am sorry that the senate didn’t hit the healthcare ball out of the political ballpark. But healthcare is on first base and Barack Obama is up to bat. We have a long way to go, but we haven’t lost, yet. And for that, I hope you can understand my enthusiasm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bushzombie.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=84</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why You Don&#8217;t Do Clicker Training with your Rabid Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=78</link>
		<comments>http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=78#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 19:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Bushzombie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an issue for the NON Zombies. 
Zombies – listen up &#8212; go to your room!
There now, isn’t that better.
Yes, Bush may be gone, but the Zombies live on. OMG they are completely nuts!
The latest in a series of crazed outrages proves my point about why it’s useless to have dialog with the right [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="line-height: 12.9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;">This is an issue for the NON Zombies. </span></p>
<p style="line-height: 12.9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;">Zombies – listen up &#8212; go to your room!</span></span></p>
<p style="line-height: 12.9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;">There now, isn’t that better.</span></span></p>
<p style="line-height: 12.9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;">Yes, Bush may be gone, but the Zombies live on. OMG they are completely nuts!</span></span></p>
<p style="line-height: 12.9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;">The latest in a series of crazed outrages proves my point about why it’s useless to have dialog with the right wing. Because NOW, Obama is &#8220;AFTER YOUR CHILDREN AAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!! IN SCHOOL NO LESS!!!!! HE’S TAKING OVER THEIR BRAINS!!!! HE IS INDOCTRONATING THEM!!!!!! AAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH!!!! WE’RE ALL DOOMED!&#8221;</span></span></p>
<p style="line-height: 12.9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;">The wacko nonsense coming from the right is just bizarre. </span></span></p>
<p style="line-height: 12.9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;">So you must put this in perspective. The right wingnuts believe what they believe and there is nothing you can do about it. They are complete Zombies. This is pathological, not poignant thought. They have no idea about any of the issues, the real economic impacts, the true cost to our country or even the real motives behind ANY of the participants, whether it’s the right wing or the left wing. For them, it&#8217;s paranoia, hysteria, anxiety and despair. </span></span></p>
<p style="line-height: 12.9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;">Why are they acting this way? The left wrings their hands in their lefty way, thinking it’s their duty to understand.</span></span></p>
<p style="line-height: 12.9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;">This act of discussion is detrimental. The question is not worth asking and to be honest, it gives them a tinge of credibility. </span></span></p>
<p style="line-height: 12.9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;">BUT WHY? The cerebral left STILL asks&#8230; </span></span></p>
<p style="line-height: 12.9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;">Let me put it this way: It&#8217;s PATHOLOGICAL. </span></span></p>
<p style="line-height: 12.9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;">You must remember that for the right, there are two kinds of people, the ones stirring the pot and the ones that are eating turd soup. For the Zombies, which is 90% of the right, they have no ability to control their thought. They CANNOT change their thinking because it isn&#8217;t theirs. It’s the crap that their leaders ladled into their heads. They are programmed &#8212; hard wired, STUCK in their way of thinking. It may be turd soup to you and me, but for the Zombies it’s good because they are told it’s good. </span></span></p>
<p style="line-height: 12.9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;">So stop thinking you can &#8220;talk to&#8221; or &#8220;make sense of&#8221; the antics of the right wingnuts. </span></span></p>
<p style="line-height: 12.9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;">Or, to put it another way, think of wingnuts the same way you would consider a rabid dog. There&#8217;s a good reason you don&#8217;t see dogs with Rabies at clicker/obedience training. </span></span></p>
<p style="line-height: 12.9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;">And that same reason is why Obama needs to give up on the right wing. </span></p>
<p style="line-height: 12.9pt;"><span style="font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;">Because they are batcrap crazy.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bushzombie.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=78</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Healhcare Crysis</title>
		<link>http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=77</link>
		<comments>http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=77#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 20:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Bushzombie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How did this insurance thing happen, anyway? It doesn&#8217;t deliver one ounce of health care.
So how did 45 or 50 million people end up without insurance?
The answer and the solution are complex, yet are based on something very simple: Supply and Demand. The insurance problem is all about weak demand for labor. How weak is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did this insurance thing happen, anyway? It doesn&#8217;t deliver one ounce of health care.</p>
<p>So how did 45 or 50 million people end up without insurance?</p>
<p>The answer and the solution are complex, yet are based on something very simple: Supply and Demand. The insurance problem is all about weak demand for labor. How weak is demand for labor? There are now 6 job seekers for every job opening.</p>
<p>I remember when most American companies supplied their workers with health insurance. There were a number of reasons for this, but mainly it was a matter of demand. Companies couldn&#8217;t attract workers if they didn&#8217;t offer some kind of benefit package. The corporations also received tax incentives to do this, as they do now. What has broken is the demand for labor. And the reason for this breakage is the direct result of supply side thinkers. I recommend reading Ravi Batra if you wish to learn more about this. And unfortunately, Obama has some real supply side tendencies &#8212; although nothing compared to the conservatives.</p>
<p>What does this have to do with healthcare?</p>
<p>Everything!</p>
<p>We have now lost more jobs during this &#8220;economic cycle&#8221; than all the jobs created since 2001.<br />
http://www.epi.org/publications/entry/jobs_picture_20090702/</p>
<p>I could go on for 50 or 60 pages, but suffice it to say that the issue with healthcare, the 47 to 50 million uninsured are a symptom of this economic crisis.</p>
<p>Now for a treat&#8230; This sums it up.</p>
<p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKv6RcXa2UI</p>
<p>ATTENTION, POLITICIANS: You cannot fix the economy by acting like conservatives. It will not work (or haven&#8217;t you been paying attention).</p>
<p>No money to the DCCC until I see the result of the voting.</p>
<p>As for the DSCC, dido.</p>
<p>Back to the economy.</p>
<p>Without a vibrant economy, meaning a resurgence of a manufacturing base, we will continue to see dwindling health insurance offered by corporations. This means we must have a public option because we are paying for it anyway.</p>
<p>The problem with healthcare is a symptom of economic conditions. Conservative Democrats are misguided if they believe they will retain their seats by re-enforcing the policies that put us here in the first place. This conservative economic thinking is sinking our country fast. It&#8217;s time to do what works and quit embracing the current brand of conservatism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bushzombie.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=77</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lynn Cheney had the Balls In Her Family</title>
		<link>http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=72</link>
		<comments>http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=72#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 05:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Bushzombie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you’re interested in what it is like to live inside the mind of a Republican, you can achieve this in one of two ways:
1. Put your head in a 55 gallon drum and have your neighbor beat the shit out of it with a baseball bat, or ….
2. Listen to the dingbat conserve-bots on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you’re interested in what it is like to live inside the mind of a Republican, you can achieve this in one of two ways:</p>
<p>1. Put your head in a 55 gallon drum and have your neighbor beat the shit out of it with a baseball bat, or ….</p>
<p>2. Listen to the dingbat conserve-bots on Sunday morning.</p>
<p>In fact, regardless of which method you use the outcome will be identical.</p>
<p>This week I listened to Lynn Cheney et. al. on This Week with George Stephanopoulos. Lynn is like her father in many ways: A Sociopathic-schizophrenic–delusional-extroverted-lesbian. Oh wait, I’m not sure Dick is a lesbian. But one thing is for sure: Lynne Cheney is the man in her family because she has biggest balls I have ever seen. She continued to dream about the Republicans coming back from their walk in the desert, i.e. that Dick is just discussing how ‘safe’ everyone is in recent weeks, reminding us of how ‘Obama’ is making us ‘unsafe’. And the people out there in the U.S. will come back to the Rebpulican party when they realize how wonderful things are and how safe everything is, and why Obama is bad, and Dick is a shining light… Oh brother. I upchucked at least three times.</p>
<p>What drivel!</p>
<p>Here are the facts:</p>
<p>Bush and Cheney cut the funding for terrorists when they took office. They ignored warnings that led to the deaths of 3,000 Americans. Now it seems that in 2002 that what REALLY happened was that Bush and Cheney tortured people so extract confessions so they would have a link between Iraq and 911.</p>
<p>I listened to the The McLaughlin Group too. The Republicans there, Pat and Monica (gag) say the same thing, except they use the economy as their bate to the American people. Let me summarize: The American economy will have a double dip recession due to spending and this will mean Obama is OUT.</p>
<p>The truth is that Obama didn’t do any of this and he not simply has to try to slowly unravel the disaster called “Bush and Cheney” foreign relations, the collapse of our economy and the stupid asses that are too f)#($&amp; dumb to realize they’ve been screwed by these bastards.</p>
<p>I find conservatism amazing. Basically it’s like emotional Judo, to use people’s own stupidity against them to make them even dumber.<br />
Here’s the next fact for darling Lynn, John, Pat and Monica, the super hypocrites: Cheney and Bush better hope the atheists are right. Because there ain’t no road that will take these SOBs from earth to heaven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bushzombie.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=72</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Markets are Not Good for American Labor</title>
		<link>http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=69</link>
		<comments>http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=69#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 12:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Bushzombie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the Economic Policy Institute, from 1997 to 2007, 235 thousand automobile bodies and parts were off-shored as our trade deficit ballooned to 32.2 billion dollars. However, the profits flowed into American corporate coffers even as the dollars flowed into the hands of foreign workers. Even those days are past us now as Chrysler [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">According to the Economic Policy Institute, from 1997 to 2007, 235 thousand automobile bodies and parts were off-shored as our trade deficit ballooned to 32.2 billion dollars. However, the profits flowed into American corporate coffers even as the dollars flowed into the hands of foreign workers. Even those days are past us now as Chrysler is taken over by Fiat, a foreign auto manufacturer. </span><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">While it is true this arraignment will keep some American jobs, Robert Scott from the Economic Policy Institute concludes that 900,000 jobs will be lost through this type of bankruptcy. The result will be tax payers subsidizing unemployed American workers while a foreign country reaps the benefits. Manufacturing profits will flow to non U.S. corporations along with lost jobs and America’s prosperity. </span></p>
<ul style="margin-top: 0in;" type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-list: l3 level1 lfo1;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">In March, the BLS recorded the largest increase in unemployment since 1983, 663,000 lost jobs. </span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-list: l3 level1 lfo1;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">Since 2006, the employee to population ration as declined 3.5% to 59.9%, the steepest decline since the great depression. </span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-list: l3 level1 lfo1;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">Long term unemployment, people unemployed for 6 months or more rose to 24.2% and there are now about 4 workers for every job opening.</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-list: l3 level1 lfo1;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">And now GM is announcing even more plant closings due to slow demand.</span></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">Since we embarked on Supply Side Economics and Milton Friedman style free market policies in the 1980s, we have seen our economy and country decline. U.S. equity from the end of World War II through the 70s began to erode and disappear in the last 8 years. We have even squandered a trillion dollars from the Social Security Trust Fund to fuel the fires of declining demand for labor and foreign wars. And <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">some say</em> retirees who have paid into this fund will just have to live with their losses. That is the “free market” after all. That is the new mantra from our corporate brethren; that Americans will have to learn their new place. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">In 1975, a blue collar worker could support a family of 4 on a single salary, yet today demand for labor has reached a point where 2 or 3 full time workers are needed to support the same living standard. In reality, <strong style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">even</em></strong> that standard is not the same. </span></p>
<ul style="margin-top: 0in;" type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">How can a mother or father read a book to a child after working 80 hours? Over the past decade, Americans have worked more hours than any country in the industrialized world, even Japan.</span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">How can a parent explain to a child what a healthy dinner looks like if that same parent is so exhausted they cannot cook dinner even for themselves? </span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">How can we espouse family values when parents work 2 or 3 jobs? </span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">And now that there are no jobs, how can a parent teach working values when they cannot even find a job or pay their own bills.</span></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><strong style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal;"><em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">And what have we as Americas gained? </span></span></em></strong></p>
<ul style="margin-top: 0in;" type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">For the majority: cheap, low quality, chemically laced consumer goods purchased using a credit card because we have no money. </span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo2;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">For a few, less than 1/10<sup>th</sup> of 1%, the gains of these policies are wealth beyond imagination; untaxed and ill gained. </span></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">Why would we expect a healthy society when 99.9% of Americans and American jobs are put last? </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">Several weeks ago I overheard a conversation from a manager at a financial institution. The firm’s goal is to have 90% of jobs off-shored by this summer. The same firm is inundated with foreigners on H1B Visas. Yet the same firm could not exist without American demand for their product. It is Americans that keep this company in business. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">How can we survive as a nation if our leaders allow corporate profits to strip Americans of a living wage? This kind of behavior must be punished if we are to maintain a moral and free people, because morality is based, in part, on the ability to make acceptable living choices. The difference between a foreign worker lay-off and an American worker lay-off is this: </span></p>
<ul style="margin-top: 0in;" type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-list: l2 level1 lfo4;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">A foreign worker can return to their country. </span></li>
</ul>
<ul style="margin-top: 0in;" type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo3;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">An American worker is already home.</span></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">Imported high tech workers directly compete with jobs in the U.S. and this is not slated to change until 2010. Why should I tell my children to go to college? It is not difficult to educate an American worker. Take a scrap of paper from the drawer and write this phrase: “Welcome to Wal-Mart”. Then tell the graduate “congratulations, you are now part of the American work force.” <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">Most Americans are not economists. They do not understand what has happened to their lives. They only feel the pain. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>They do not understand “free trade” is another word for poverty. And why would they understand? They are told each and every day that global trade is beneficial and cannot be stopped. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">This is a lie.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">The global market has turned American workers into a commodity, like pork bellies, Yellow Corn Number #2 or a barrel of oil. The rule of supply and demand is simple, unambiguous and unarguable. If supply for any product increases, the price for that same product decreases. For workers, that product is called, “A Wage.” As long as Americans are forced to compete globally with workers who have subsidized healthcare or slave labor, America’s labor value will be weak. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">To put it another way, until we place tariffs on goods imported into the United States, we will continue to operate as a third world country, where raw materials flow off shore to be processed and profits flow into the hands of a few powerful people. I continue to hear each day that we must compete in the global marketplace. My question is simple: Why? I cannot seem to get a good answer. Are our leaders saying that Americans cannot produce goods? Certainly this is becoming the case as our education system degrades with our roads and bridges, but it is not true quite yet.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Calibri;">Our economy will never recover unless we put American workers and manufacturing in first place over greedy corporations and paid off politicians. How far does America have to sink before we get this change? <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>We cannot wait another minute. Our future depends on putting America on a level playing field.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bushzombie.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=69</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Baggers - The Mark if Conservative Genius.</title>
		<link>http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=59</link>
		<comments>http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=59#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Bushzombie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was very amused at the “Tea Bagging” parties. It is truly like watching an episode of the 3 stooges.
However, there is a serious issue here about the “spending” problem.
Over the last 8 years, the Republicans ran this country into the ditch and looted it of every red cent. All I heard from the right [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">I was very amused at the “Tea Bagging” parties. It is truly like watching an episode of the 3 stooges.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">However, there is a serious issue here about the “spending” problem.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Over the last 8 years, the Republicans ran this country into the ditch and looted it of every red cent. All I heard from the right wing was how “Deficits” don’t matter. It was okay that Bush literally burned through a trillion dollars of the Social Security Trust Fund leaving IOUs and saying, &#8220;See Social Security is Broke!&#8221; The supply side whack-o-bots took loans from China to pay for unnecessary tax cuts. The economic foundation of the United States be damned, all that mattered was people making $1,000,000 per year in adjusted gross income were awarded an 11.2% tax cut, paid with loans from foreign countries, while Joe Plumber got a 2.5% tax break. (Of course Joe isn&#8217;t the sharpest tool in the shed, so he won&#8217;t notice).</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">And now it&#8217;s time to pay the bill, except the country is in shambles. The &#8220;Tea Baggers&#8221; want to ignore the fact that 8 years of conservatism brought party girls, whisky and wars. Now that we need to repair the roof, it&#8217;s time to STOP spending?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The conservatives blew money in Iraq &#8212; not on equipment or veterans, but on waste. Example: 360 tons of $100 dollar bills in C130 planes (12B). The loot dropped to contractors, Iraqi thugs and Backwater mercenaries. Billions lost. Subsidies to billionaires, corporate welfare run amuck, no controls, no regulation, 6, 7, 8 trillion dollars burned, and an iron fist control of Congress and the Executive.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">They doubled the deficit and achieved nothing except making the super rich, super stupendously rich. Of course the super stupendously rich hoard money offshore, contributing to America&#8217;s collapse while NOT PAYING TAXES. Why should they pay taxes? Because it is America that made them rich, not the other way around. The rich owe their country for use of the electrical grid, clean running water, the legal system, police, fire, military, local government, roads, and so on. Money taken from America and Americans without paying their fair share. In other words, stealing.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The conservatives took a surplus and turned it into the worst deficit since the LAST Republican administration held office.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The Republicans have destroyed the country and now they are pissing and complaining that we’re trying to dig our way out of a ditch. The shallow, lying, hypocritical, pitch of the right wing is like finger nails on a chalk board. One has to ask the question, “It is ignorance, brainwashing or are they just shills?&#8221;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I will concede, there were Democratic co-conspirators. But as America figures out that it has been duped, the tide will turn even for the conservative Democrats.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Amusingly, my right wing friends now agree with ME. They may hate Obama, indeed, but they hate the Republicans way more. How funny is THAT!!! The right wing has been twiddled down to a mob of un-credible, whiney, losers who have wiped out most of their constituents by screwing them. I find it ironic, one of my Bush supporting, Obama hating, Palin Loving, NO-Bama co-workers can&#8217;t argue with me at work any longer. She was laid off due to budget cuts.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">In the past, the super rich conservatives have retained power over the con-servo-bots by stealing elections, bribing them with our own stolen tax dollars and buying the media while pointing fingers the other way.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Those days are past. There&#8217;s no money left to steal. Like a farmer who eats his breeding stock, the &#8220;farm&#8221; called the U.S. economy has been ravaged by greed, greed, greed, and finally, more greed. Can there be any apologists left? Oh yeah, stage right come the &#8220;Tea Baggers&#8221;.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">With their backs against one another, dead horses lying about, Custer yelling charge, arrows flying, dead soldiers and thousands of Indians surrounding them&#8230; the remaining right wing fighters have a final last “Tea Bagging” plan to win the battle.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Let’s review what a “Tea Bagger” actually is (Urban Dictionary, since street slang has not been adopted by Websters) :</p>
<table class="MsoNormalTable" border="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 0.75pt;">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif;">1. </span></p>
</td>
<td style="padding: 0.75pt;">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif;">T</span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif;">eabagger </span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 0.75pt;"> </td>
<td style="padding: 0.75pt;" colspan="2">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif;">Multiple meanings. 1) One who carries large bags of packaged tea for shipment. 2) A man that squats on top of a women&#8217;s face and lowers his genitals into her mouth during sex, known as &#8220;teabagging&#8221; 3) One who has a job or talent that is low in social status 4) A person who is unaware that they have said or done something foolish, childlike, noobish, lame, or inconvenient. 5) Also see &#8220;fagbag&#8221;, &#8220;lamer&#8221;, &#8220;noob&#8221; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0pt; line-height: normal;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif;">Matt: I can&#8217;t believe he skipped our LAN party to go to practice. Yeah, that kid is such a teabagger. </span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="MsoNormal">And so like Custer, the &#8220;tea baggers&#8221; go down for the last time, looking like the clueless fools they are.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Oh sure, there will be those who say, &#8220;TERRIBLE! Lies, innuendo, unproven, your comments are OVER THE TOP! Show me the proof. Where is it? I want the PROOOOOOOF!!!!! It was the DEMOCRATS! It&#8217;s the LIBERALS! They ruined the country, they did it! IT WAS THEM!&#8221;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">To those people I simple say, look around. Just take a look at 8 years of unbridled conservatism. The cons had the House of Representatives since 1994. The cons have had a majority in the Senate much of that time, holding a majority during most of the Bush years. The conservatives held the Executive branch. They appointed their people to the Judicial, and really, our nation has been on a conservative tilt since Ronald Regan took office. Yes, 28 years of supply side, voodoo conservatism has crippled our nation.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Want proof?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Look around.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The conservatives have ruled this country, and the more power they had, the worse things got. Blaming our ills on liberalism no longer passes the laugh test, and neither does &#8220;tea bagging&#8221;. Conservatives may have forgotten, people in America do have eyes and ears. While many Americans may be ignornat because of our conservative educational system, they can feel pangs of hunger when they can&#8217;t afford food and they can feel the rain hitting the top of their head while they live on the streets, unable to pay their mortgage.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">To the remaining conservatives I say: &#8220;Good luck, and may your tea bagging go as well in the future as it did on April 15th, whatever meaning it happened to be.&#8221;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">If they weren’t so dangerous, I would fall down laughing at the new crop of con-servo-bots. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bushzombie.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=59</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Blame Bush&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=56</link>
		<comments>http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=56#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 03:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Bushzombie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Bush’s waning days, he has achieved a unique title: The lowest approval rating of any president – ever. Many may think that this is his badge to wear, that George is now getting exactly what he deserves for driving our country into the ditch, leaving us with a second great depression, placing us into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Bush’s waning days, he has achieved a unique title: The lowest approval rating of any president – ever. Many may think that this is his badge to wear, that George is now getting exactly what he deserves for driving our country into the ditch, leaving us with a second great depression, placing us into a war of choice and giving our commons away to foreign interests.</p>
<p>I think George is getting a bad rap.</p>
<p>Why? You might ask. After all, Bush has destroyed our nation, jeopardized our future and quite possibly, played the fiddle while a nation burned to the ground.</p>
<p>But the question I ask is much different. I do not ask whether he destroyed our country, for that is not the question. Did Bush deliver the desires of his constituency, the conservative movement? On this point, Bush was practically flawless.</p>
<p>1. On Economics – Grade of B+</p>
<p>Bush has been in favor and delivered Lessee faire, free market economics – supply side economics. Regulations were either cut or ignored. He bragged of home ownership in his 2004 presidential race based on loosening regulations. Bush delivered a tax cut of more than 11% to those making more than $1 million per year, and shifted the tax burden to the middle class (who received about a 2.5% decrease in taxes), using borrowed dollars.</p>
<p>Supply side, tax cuts are the mantra of the conservatism.</p>
<p>2. On the Environment – Grade of A</p>
<p>Bush has deregulated many dozens of federal agencies, by either making them inept or de-funding them. From the USDA to the Environmental Protection Agency, they have been either stripped or rendered useless. Removing, stifling and repealing government regulation is the mantra of the conservative movement.</p>
<p>3. On Education – Grade of A</p>
<p>Bush has implemented unfunded, unworkable mandates that have rendered the education systems ineffective. No Child Left Behind has enabled private enterprise to drain off education dollars for testing, delivering those dollars to corporations. He has effectively destroyed public education, which is the mantra of the conservatives.</p>
<p>4. On Foreign Policy – Grade of A</p>
<p>George has delivered a foreign policy that directly aligns with the Project for a New American Century. In this scenario, America exerts her overwhelming military might to achieve desired policy through the world. On this point, Bush has delivered exactly what the conservatives have demanded. Bush has delivered two wars, and not brought the perpetrators to justice. This has allowed a nationalistic fervor to continue occupying and expanding America’s military might, the ability to spy on its citizens and also allowed a transfer of wealth to businesses that enrich themselves: Again, the mantra of the conservative movement.</p>
<p>5. On Religion, Abortion and Reproductive Rights: B-</p>
<p>Bush has effectively blended Government and Religion. He has brought religious leaders into the Whitehouse and allowed them to dictate policy, from increasing the power of the FCC to censor to eliminating funding for stem cell research on the basis of religious policy. He has created the Department of Faith Based Initiative, and has created stringent regulations to disallow birth control throughout the world except in cases when it aligns with his religious dogma. He has not delivered a repeal of Roe vs. Wade, thus the lower rating of B-.</p>
<p>In almost every way Bush has delivered exactly what his c<span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: &quot;Georgia&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; color: black; font-size: 9pt;">onstituents </span>wanted. He has given America conservatism, in all its unfettered glory.</p>
<p>It is not Bush who has betrayed America. Conservatism has delivered its true value: To shift wealth and power into the hands of a very few.</p>
<p>Now that America lies in tatters, do not blame Bush. For he was only the messenger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bushzombie.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=56</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bye Bye Bush &#8230; Bye Bye My Money</title>
		<link>http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=55</link>
		<comments>http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=55#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Bushzombie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We just bailed out Citigroup, who&#8217;s primary owner is from Saudi Arabia.America has been raped, except we are just waking up, we feel a little groggy. What happened last night? Hmmm&#8230;. my rump is raw. HEY!!! Something feels WRONG! 
Congrats to all the fools who supported the RNC and Bush. For we have given America to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<place w:st="on"></place><font face="Times New Roman">We just bailed out <span id="misspell-0" class="mark">Citigroup</span>, who&#8217;s primary owner is from Saudi Arabia.</font><font face="Times New Roman">America has been raped, except we are just waking up, we feel a little groggy. What happened last night? <span id="misspell-1" class="mark">Hmmm</span>&#8230;. my rump is raw. HEY!!! Something feels WRONG! </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">Congrats to all the fools who supported the <span id="misspell-2" class="mark">RNC</span> and Bush. For we have given America to the enemy. Look at it this way: The Saudis killed 3500 Americans, so we went to a country that was uninvolved and gave all our money to the people who killed us. Yup, America has been destroyed from within. And now, 60 days before the end of the administration, as Bush pardons everyone, America is left in ruins. We handed a gun to a convicted murderer in jail and now we&#8217;re shocked at the bullet in our chest. </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">But look at it this way: This is just the free market economic equivalent of watching a lion sink its teeth into a gazelle on the African planes, with a few differences: 1) The <em><strong>lion</strong></em> is the corporatist politicians and firms that have run our country for the last 8 years <em><strong>and </strong></em>, 2) The gazelle is YOU (assuming you&#8217;re an average American). </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">How could this happen? People like Alan Greenspan and Milton Friedman talked us into believing we should TRUST multinational corporations to unfettered free trade and the rules of unregulated markets. Who were the masters? The <span id="misspell-3" class="mark">RNC</span> and Bush. They count, YOU don&#8217;t. And in an unregulated, free world, YOUR death is irrelevant. The world belongs to the greedy and rich (that is NOT you, in case you were wondering).</font></p>
<place w:st="on"></place><font face="Times New Roman">=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman"><country w:st="on"></country></font></p>
<place w:st="on"></place><font face="Times New Roman"><country w:st="on"></country></font></p>
<place w:st="on"></place><font face="Times New Roman">U.S. Pledges Top $7.7 Trillion to Ease Frozen Credit (Update2) </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">By Mark Pittman and Bob Ivry</font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">Nov. 24 (Bloomberg) &#8212; The U.S. government is prepared to provide more than $7.76 trillion on behalf of American taxpayers after guaranteeing $306 billion of Citigroup Inc. debt yesterday. The pledges, amounting to half the value of everything produced in the nation last year, are intended to rescue the financial system after the credit markets seized up </font><font style="background-color: #ffff00">15 months ago.</font>   <em><font color="#ff4040"><strong>&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&#8212;- WHAT THE F&amp;%#! </strong></font></em><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">The unprecedented pledge of funds includes $3.18 trillion already tapped by financial institutions in the biggest response to an economic emergency since the New Deal of the 1930s, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. </font><font style="background-color: #ffff00">The commitment dwarfs the plan approved by lawmakers, the Treasury Department’s $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program. Federal Reserve lending last week was 1,900 times the weekly average for the three years before the crisis. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">When Congress approved the TARP on Oct. 3, Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson acknowledged the need for transparency and oversight. Now, as regulators commit far more money while refusing to disclose loan recipients or reveal the collateral they are taking in return, some Congress members are calling for the Fed to be reined in. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">“Whether it’s lending or spending, it’s tax dollars that are going out the window and we end up holding collateral we don’t know anything about,” said Congressman Scott Garrett, a New Jersey Republican who serves on the House Financial Services Committee. “The time has come that we consider what sort of limitations we should be placing on the Fed so that authority returns to elected officials as opposed to appointed ones.” </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">Too Big to Fail </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">Bloomberg News tabulated data from the Fed, Treasury and Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and interviewed regulatory officials, economists and academic researchers to gauge the full extent of the government’s rescue effort. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">The bailout includes a Fed program to buy as much as $2.4 trillion in short-term notes, called commercial paper, that companies use to pay bills, begun Oct. 27, and $1.4 trillion from the FDIC to guarantee bank-to-bank loans, started Oct. 14. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">William Poole, former president of the Federal Reserve Bank of <city w:st="on"></city></font></p>
<place w:st="on"></place><font face="Times New Roman">St. Louis, said the two programs are unlikely to lose money. The bigger risk comes from rescuing companies perceived as “too big to fail,” he said. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">‘Credit Risk’ </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">The government committed $29 billion to help engineer the takeover in March of Bear Stearns Cos. by New York-based JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co. and $122.8 billion in addition to TARP allocations to bail out New York-based American International Group Inc., once the world’s largest insurer. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">Citigroup received $306 billion of government guarantees for troubled mortgages and toxic assets. The Treasury Department also will inject $20 billion into the bank after its stock fell 60 percent last week. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">“No question there is some credit risk there,”</font></p>
<place w:st="on"></place><font face="Times New Roman">Poole said. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">Congressman Darrell Issa, a California Republican on the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said risk is lurking in the programs that</font></p>
<place w:st="on"></place><font face="Times New Roman">Poole thinks are safe. </font><br />
<font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">“The thing that people don’t understand is it’s not how likely that the exposure becomes a reality, but what if it does?” Issa said. “There’s no transparency to it so who’s to say they’re right?” </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">The worst financial crisis in two generations has erased $23 trillion, or 38 percent, of the value of the world’s companies and brought down three of the biggest Wall Street firms. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">Markets Down </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">The Dow Jones Industrial Average through Friday is down 38 percent since the beginning of the year and 43 percent from its peak on Oct. 9, 2007. The S&amp;P 500 fell 45 percent from the beginning of the year through Friday and 49 percent from its peak on Oct. 9, 2007. The Nikkei 225 Index has fallen 46 percent from the beginning of the year through Friday and 57 percent from its most recent peak of 18,261.98 on July 9, 2007. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. is down 78 percent, to $53.31, on Friday from its peak of $247.92 on Oct. 31, 2007, and 75 percent this year. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">Regulators hope the rescue will contain the damage and keep banks providing the credit that is the lifeblood of the <country w:st="on"></country></font></p>
<place w:st="on"></place><font face="Times New Roman">U.S. economy. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">Most of the spending programs are run out of the New York Fed, whose president, Timothy Geithner, is said to be President- elect Barack Obama’s choice to be Treasury Secretary. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">‘They Got Snookered’ </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font style="background-color: #ffff00">The money that’s been pledged is equivalent to $24,000 for every man, woman and child in the country. It’s nine times what the <country w:st="on"></country>U.S. has spent so far on wars in <country w:st="on"></country>Iraq and <country w:st="on"></country></font></p>
<place w:st="on"></place><font style="background-color: #ffff00">Afghanistan, according to Congressional Budget Office figures. It could pay off more than half the country’s mortgages. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">“It’s unprecedented,” said Bob Eisenbeis, chief monetary economist at Vineland, New Jersey-based Cumberland Advisors Inc. and an economist for the Atlanta Fed for 10 years until January. “The backlash has begun already. Congress is taking a lot of hits from their constituents because they got snookered on the TARP big time. There’s a lot of supposedly smart people who look to be totally incompetent and it’s all going to fall on the taxpayer.” </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal of the 1930s, when almost 10,000 banks failed and there was no mechanism to bolster them with cash, is the only rival to the government’s current response. The savings and loan bailout of the 1990s cost $209.5 billion in inflation-adjusted numbers, of which $173 billion came from taxpayers, according to a July 1996 report by the U.S. General Accounting Office, now called the Government Accountability Office. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">‘Worst Crisis’ </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">The 1979 <country w:st="on"></country></font></p>
<place w:st="on"></place><font face="Times New Roman">U.S. government bailout of Chrysler consisted of bond guarantees, adjusted for inflation, of $4.2 billion, according to a Heritage Foundation report. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">The commitment of public money is appropriate to the peril, said Ethan Harris, co-head of <country w:st="on"></country></font></p>
<place w:st="on"></place><font face="Times New Roman">U.S. economic research at Barclays Capital Inc. and a former economist at the New York Fed. <country w:st="on"></country></font></p>
<place w:st="on"></place><font face="Times New Roman">U.S. financial firms have taken writedowns and losses of $666.1 billion since the beginning of 2007, according to Bloomberg data. </font><br />
<font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">“This is the worst capital markets crisis in modern history,” Harris said. “So you have the biggest intervention in modern history.” </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">Bloomberg has requested details of Fed lending under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act and filed a federal lawsuit against the central bank Nov. 7 seeking to force disclosure of borrower banks and their collateral. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">Collateral is an asset pledged to a lender in the event a loan payment isn’t made. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">‘That’s Counterproductive’ </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">“Some have asked us to reveal the names of the banks that are borrowing, how much they are borrowing, what collateral they are posting,” Bernanke said Nov. 18 to the House Financial Services Committee. “We think that’s counterproductive.” </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">The Fed should account for the collateral it takes in exchange for loans to banks, said Paul Kasriel, chief economist at Chicago-based Northern Trust Corp. and a former research economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of <city w:st="on"></city></font></p>
<place w:st="on"></place><font face="Times New Roman">Chicago. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">“There is a lack of transparency here and, given that the Fed is taking on a huge amount of credit risk now, it would seem to me as a taxpayer there should be more transparency,” Kasriel said. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">Bernanke’s Fed is responsible for $4.74 trillion of pledges, or 61 percent of the total commitment of $7.76 trillion, based on data compiled by Bloomberg concerning <country w:st="on"></country></font></p>
<place w:st="on"></place><font face="Times New Roman">U.S. bailout steps started a year ago. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">“Too often the public is focused on the wrong piece of that number, the $700 billion that Congress approved,” said J.D. Foster, a former staff member of the Council of Economic Advisers who is now a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation in <state w:st="on"></state></font></p>
<place w:st="on"></place><font face="Times New Roman">Washington. “The other areas are quite a bit larger.” </font><br />
<font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">Fed Rescue Efforts </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">The Fed’s rescue attempts began last December with the creation of the Term Auction Facility to allow lending to dealers for collateral. After Bear Stearns’s collapse in March, the central bank started making direct loans to securities firms at the same discount rate it charges commercial banks, which take customer deposits. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">In the three years before the crisis, such average weekly borrowing by banks was $48 million, according to the central bank. Last week it was $91.5 billion. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">The failure of a second securities firm, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., in September, led to the creation of the Commercial Paper Funding Facility and the Money Market Investor Funding Facility, or MMIFF. The two programs, which have pledged $2.3 trillion, are designed to restore calm in the money markets, which deal in certificates of deposit, commercial paper and Treasury bills. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">Lehman Failure </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">“Money markets seized up after Lehman failed,” said Neal Soss, chief economist at Credit Suisse Group in <state w:st="on"></state></font></p>
<place w:st="on"></place><font face="Times New Roman">New York and a former aide to Fed chief Paul Volcker. “Lehman failing made a lot of subsequent actions necessary.” </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">The FDIC, chaired by Sheila Bair, is contributing 20 percent of total rescue commitments. The FDIC’s $1.4 trillion in guarantees will amount to a bank subsidy of as much as $54 billion over three years, or $18 billion a year, because borrowers will pay a lower interest rate than they would on the open market, according to Raghu Sundurum and Viral Acharya of New York University and the</font></p>
<place w:st="on"></place>
<placename w:st="on"></placename><font face="Times New Roman">London</font></p>
<placename w:st="on"></placename><font face="Times New Roman">Business</font></p>
<placetype w:st="on"></placetype><font face="Times New Roman">School. </font><br />
<font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">Congress and the Treasury have ponied up $892 billion in TARP and other funding, or 11.5 percent. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">The Federal Housing Administration, overseen by Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary Steven Preston, was given the authority to guarantee $300 billion of mortgages, or about 4 percent of the total commitment, with its Hope for Homeowners program, designed to keep distressed borrowers from foreclosure. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">Federal Guarantees </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">Most of the federal guarantees reduce interest rates on loans to banks and securities firms, which would create a subsidy of at least $6.6 billion annually for the financial industry, according to data compiled by Bloomberg comparing rates charged by the Fed against market interest currently paid by banks. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">Not included in the calculation of pledged funds is an FDIC proposal to prevent foreclosures by guaranteeing modifications on $444 billion in mortgages at an expected cost of $24.4 billion to be paid from the TARP, according to FDIC spokesman David Barr. The Treasury Department hasn’t approved the program. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">Bernanke and Paulson, former chief executive officer of Goldman Sachs, have also promised as much as $200 billion to shore up nationalized mortgage finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, a pledge that hasn’t been allocated to any agency. The FDIC arranged for $139 billion in loan guarantees for General Electric Co.’s finance unit. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">Automakers Struggle </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font style="background-color: #ffff00">The tally doesn’t include money to General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler LLC</font>. <font style="background-color: #ff4040">&lt;&lt;&lt;&#8212; LOL </font>Obama has said he favors financial assistance to keep them from collapse. <font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">Paulson told the House Financial Services Committee Nov. 18 that the $250 billion already allocated to banks through the TARP is an investment, not an expenditure. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">“I think it would be extraordinarily unusual if the government did not get that money back and more,” Paulson said. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">In his Nov. 18 testimony, Bernanke told the House Financial Services Committee that the central bank wouldn’t lose money. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">“We take collateral, we haircut it, it is a short-term loan, it is very safe, we have never lost a penny in these various lending programs,” he said. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">A haircut refers to the practice of lending less money than the collateral’s current market value. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">Requiring the Fed to disclose loan recipients might set off panic, said David Tobin, principal of New York-based loan-sale consultants and investment bank Mission Capital Advisors LLC. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">‘Mark to Market’ </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">“If you mark to market today, the banking system is bankrupt,” Tobin said. “So what do you do? You try to keep it going as best you can.” </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">“Mark to market” means adjusting the value of an asset, such as a mortgage-backed security, to reflect current prices. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">Some of the bailout assistance could come from tax breaks in the future. The Treasury Department changed the tax code on Sept. 30 to allow banks to expand the deductions on the losses banks they were buying, according to Robert Willens, a former Lehman Brothers tax and accounting analyst who teaches at</font></p>
<placename w:st="on"></placename><font face="Times New Roman">Columbia</font></p>
<placetype w:st="on"></placetype><font face="Times New Roman">University</font></p>
<placename w:st="on"></placename><font face="Times New Roman">Business</font></p>
<placetype w:st="on"></placetype><font face="Times New Roman">School in <state w:st="on"></state></font></p>
<place w:st="on"></place><font face="Times New Roman">New York. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">Wells Fargo &amp; Co., which is buying Charlotte, North Carolina-based Wachovia Corp., will be able to deduct $22 billion, Willens said. Adding in other banks, the code change will cost $29 billion, he said. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font><font face="Times New Roman">“The rule is now popularly known among tax lawyers as the ‘Wells Fargo Notice,’” Willens said. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">The regulation was changed to make it easier for healthy banks to buy troubled ones, said Treasury Department spokesman Andrew DeSouza. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank said he was angry that banks used the money for acquisitions. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">“The only purpose for this money is to lend,” said Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat. “It’s not for dividends, it’s not for purchases of new banks, it’s not for bonuses. There better be a showing of increased lending roughly in the amount of the capital infusions” or Congress may not approve the second half of the TARP money. </font><font face="Times New Roman"> </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman">To contact the reporters on this story: Mark Pittman in <state w:st="on"></state>New York at mpittman@bloomberg.net; Bob Ivry in <state w:st="on"></state></font></p>
<place w:st="on"></place><font face="Times New Roman">New York at bivry@bloomberg.net. </font></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Last Updated: November 24, 2008 13:26 EST</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bushzombie.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=55</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joe The Plumber is a Fake</title>
		<link>http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=54</link>
		<comments>http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=54#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 15:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Bushzombie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bushzombie.com/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attention all Zombies&#8230;
I think I know who YOU, the zombies are voting for&#8230; John McCain.
How do I know this? Because I have seen Joe the Plumber and he is nothing. Yet the zombies continue to bow at his feet, loving his every move, believing he is a country singer.

The truth about Joe. Joe is:
A plumber [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attention all Zombies&#8230;</p>
<p>I think I know who YOU, the zombies are voting for&#8230; John McCain.</p>
<p>How do I know this? Because I have seen Joe the Plumber and he is <em>nothing.</em> Yet the zombies continue to bow at his feet, loving his every move, believing he is a country singer.</p>
<ul>
<li>The truth about Joe. Joe is:</li>
<li>A plumber (Not)</li>
<li>Earns $250,000 per year (Not)</li>
<li>Has his own business (Not)</li>
<li>Represents middle America (Not)</li>
<li>Wasn&#8217;t a plant by the McCain &#8212; that is he&#8217;s a &#8220;real guy&#8221; (Not)</li>
<li>Is a fraud!! (True)</li>
</ul>
<p>Why is the right wing delusional about this? I can&#8217;t figure it out. This guy is a fake, a complete fraud. He is a nothing. Joe and the right wing misrepresented what Obama said with the &#8220;share the wealth&#8221; statement. On the other hand, look at Palin. After being found guilty of ethics viloations, she thanked the commission for finding her innocent. Ted Stevens said yesterday that he has &#8220;not been convicted of anything.&#8221;</p>
<p>WTF?</p>
<p>I am starting to feel like I&#8217;m in some kind of version of <em>Invasion of the Body Snatchers</em>.</p>
<p>Yes, with each passing day I am more and more convinced that the Right Wing is really just a bunch of zombies. Or maybe, as the sane people keep jumping off the Republican ship, the only people left are insane. Or maybe the zombie bloodline is being purified. In any case, I am glad to see Obama will be the next president. Because it is obvious that the right cannot fix anything.</p>
<p>They can&#8217;t even figure out how to see reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bushzombie.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=54</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
